Evaluating Real Estate Options When Adding a Physician

Most physicians who are given the opportunity to join a private practice expect to eventually become partners. Typically, after a few years as an employee, physicians are provided partnership role by way of purchase opportunity. The purchase would be based upon the value of the equipment, furnishings, accounts receivable and goodwill. Most practices tend to lease their medical office space, so no value is attributable to bricks and mortar. However, some practices own the real estate and issues arise as to whether incoming physicians will be provided ownership in the real estate.

The majority of medical practices are still structured as professional corporations. Typically, if the real estate is not leased, it will not be owned by the practice corporation itself for both liability and tax reasons. Rather, the facility or condominium will be owned by a separate entity. This entity is commonly structured as either a partnership or limited liability company, or if a single doctor is involved, the real estate could be owned jointly with the doctor’s spouse. Thus, a physician may become a partner of the medical practice entity without becoming a partner of the real estate entity.

In the past, most physicians showed little interest in becoming a partner in the real estate entity, not having a true understanding of commercial real estate as an investment. Additionally, they may not have been able to produce the financial requirement for buy-in to the entity or felt the location was not suitable. Whatever the reason, it was more likely than not that an incoming physician did not consider the investment. Today, with greater access to information and investment opportunities, physicians are very interested in real estate.

Prior to being added to a practice group, it is important to know the culture and seek like strategies for ancillary or investment opportunities.  As per example, most senior physicians within the practice group may not share access to real estate ownership. Because real estate development, purchase and management is a significant investment of money (and time), it is understandable that incoming physicians would not be allowed access. Because of this, the senior physicians maintain that they will hold on to it as an investment for, or throughout, retirement. We are seeing some leeway here, though.

As an incoming physician, it would be important to take a good look at the real estate piece, no matter the situation of lease or purchase. If it is a lease, there will exist a written lease between two entities. The lease should not be above fair market value rental rate and in place for a reasonable period of time, both to be discussed further. If the rent is too high, perhaps to provide tax benefits to the owners of the real estate, there will be less capital to improve the practice. If the term is too short, you will face renegotiation of the rent too often, which will tends to create more advantage for owners that lease space. If the term is too long, the rent will likely step up each year to become a larger proportionate share of liabilities for the practice group.

In the situation of ownership, if the real estate is owned by one or more senior physicians, the practice will likely seek to relocate if they decide to sell the real estate. In order to avoid this situation, in addition to a long-term lease or a short-term lease with options to renew, the real estate owner(s) could give the non-owner practice partners an option to buy the real estate at an appraised value upon retirement or death, or a right of first refusal.
Now let’s assume that all parties wish to have an incoming physician buy in to the real estate entity. This may either occur at the time as the purchase into the practice entity or at the point the doctor has completed his or her buy-in. If the latter option is pursued, presumably, they will be more able to afford the buy-in to the real estate. In any event, the main issues will become the buy-in price and manner of payment.

The price can be determined in a few ways. One is simply by mutual agreement of all parties. Another method is simply using the original cost of the real estate if it was recently purchased, or the original cost plus annual CPI (Consumer Price Index) increases. The most common method, however, is by means of an an appraiser or broker opinion of value through appraisal or our brokerage entity. The fees could be as low as $500.

Once the price is determined, the manner of payment needs to be approached. One option is to simply pay each owner his or her share up front. If that is not possible, a promissory note could exist in favor of each real estate partner with payments made over time with interest.

A common method exists for partners to refinance the mortgage to as close to 100 percent financing as possible. The new partner would simply sign the new mortgage and be equally responsible for the debt without having to pay any out-of-pocket buy-in. The existing partners are able to pull out the cash equity at that time to realize a return on their investment. When interest rates are declining, refinancing is more likely to occur. A caveat is, if interest rates increase, the existing partners may not be willing to choose the method of refinancing due to larger interest payments, and, presumably, lesser real estate value.

Should a partner leave or retire from the medical practice, will they become obligated to sell his or her interest in the real estate and should the remaining partners be obligated to purchase his or her interest? If so, at what price? Thus, it is important to have the document treated carefully or via retainership of legal counsel.

Often times the inclusion of a physician to a practice group involves several items, including real estate, that should be addressed with business intelligence. MREA is capable of assisting in your next physician addition, partner acquisition or real estate transition. Contact your local representative for assistance.

Hospitals Employing Physicians: Is It Different This Time?

Around 15 years ago, physician practices were purchased by hospitals at compellingly high prices. Unfortunately for these hospital systems, within a matter of just a few years, the physicians were re-injected back into the community, largely because the hospital systems had not realized a return on investment. Fast forward to 2012, we hear similar stories about physicians becoming incorporated into a hospital’s network.
The reasons for hospital systems obtaining physician groups may be many. But, most conversations boil down to either a specialty or geographic play, whereby hospitals seek entrance or command of certain designated fields or locales. Also, with the establishment of healthcare reform, and impetus from both hospital and physicians for greater reimbursements, as well as a movement to adopt a more streamlined, technologically advanced care distribution model — we think this time may be different.
Based on casual conversations, the motivations to join a hospital from a physician perspective is appearing much greater today than it was in the mid-90′s. A weakened economy, high employment or practice costs, entry barriers, a more savvy-consumer, and the potential for declining reimbursements, are among the top justifications that we hear from physician groups.
There seems to be a greater number of differences in how the hospital systems are purchasing medical practices today, though, when compared to that of years past. Mainly, hospital systems are not offering to pay exorbitant prices, likely as a result of previous miscalculations. As for those that we speak with, many are not seeking to purchase practices outright (staff, equipment, management, real estate, in some cases). Instead, the hospital is offering employment compensation, with greater emphasis on incentives for productivity, to a select group of physicians for a number of years. Also, because reform will include greater regulatory oversight of physician purchases, this may be an incentive for hospitals to complete acquisitions prior to 2014, when the majority of reform’s initiatives take effect.

The most common way that a physician practice group is absorbed by a hospital is through a method where physician owners and practice administrators keep an ongoing operation in place, essentially subjecting to less guidelines and oversight, but to assume some naming rights, some jurisdiction, as well as partnership for likely for potential future transaction.

As for the outright sale of a practice to a hospital, it may be achieved in several different ways. A hospital may purchase a practice’s tangible assets with physicians and staff as employees of the practice, whereby the unit is obtained as a separate entity. In another instance, the hospital may acquire the assets, physicians and staff to become employees of the hospital, in which the practice discontinues. As for unique circumstances, the staff becomes employees of the hospital, but the physicians remain separate.

A certain consideration should be made by physician groups as to the value of their practice to the hospital system. Because anti-kickback laws exist, the hospital cannot pay a physician group more than ‘fair value’ for their practice. Any payment that is beyond a certain amount could be considered a ‘kickback’ for services provided to the hospital. Also, keep in mind, the revenue generated by physicians for referrals outside of the practice itself are not considered in the valuation.

Another issue that comes from a practice purchase is that physicians are not relieved of their responsibilities. This is because the acquisition is commonly considered a separate operating division or profit center of the hospital. Consequently, the physicians compensation is still tied to the profitability of their previous medical practice. This provides troublesome if physicians are nearing retirement.

One last reminder, and a stark reminder of how this time may be different, is how the practice’s patients now can easily become part of hospital’s affiliated practice, especially with the advent of electronic medical records. In essence, the hospital now owns and operates all patient lists and records that have been accumulated by the practice group.

While I will leave you with the determination of whether it is better to sell, partner or lease with a hospital, MREA has established healthcare real estate professionals, accountants and attorneys to whom you have access. Contact us for our wide range of client responsibilities that incorporate business strategies with extensive real estate capabilities.

PWC/ULI: Texas Buoyed by the Three US Employment Drivers

One of the most popular reads for the commercial real estate industry, the PWC/ULI Emerging Trends for Real Estate 2012 suggests Houston is very well positioned to capture investment dollars with strong medical, increasing technology sector and high oil prices.

Interesting excerpts:

1. Trophy and Medical Offices. Gateway class A office space always commands attention, but interest flags elsewhere, especially in the suburbs. Expect slim pickings when dipping into second-tier cities, and forget about office parks. Niche-sector, medical office space gains favor: “The tenants are recessionproof,” and “the health care act will help spur demand as more hospital procedures move into doctors’ offices.” Over the longer term, a bulging senior citizen population promises to expand needs for various outpatient facilities and clinics.

2. If real estate is “all about jobs,” then head to the few cities where employment growth actually occurs. Besides the gateways, the current front-runners rely on energy, high tech,
and health care–related industries, as well as universities and government offices. Austin becomes a current favorite because it claims all these attributes. Bigger Texas cities—Houston and Dallas—also sustain investor interest because of their energy backbones.

3. Pockets of hiring occur in certain industries and parts of the country:

The strong energy sector, driven by current ■■ high oil prices, helps Texas cities and some out-of-the-way places like NorthDakota (“not exactly a happening real estate market,” says an interviewee).

■■ Technology boosts northern California, the Seattle area, Boston, and smaller high-tech markets like Austin and Raleigh-Durham.

■■ Health care expands everywhere. The steadily graying population needs more medical attention, but work skews to lower-paid aides or highly skilled doctors, nurses, and
technicians.

4. Until recent energy industry gains, hot growth cities Dallas and Houston consistently registered lagging investment ratings. As long as oil and gas prices remain high, these markets will continue to make survey inroads, but investors should remain wary of historic volatility resulting from a lack of geographic and zoning barriers to restrain development.

5. Health care trends—rising older demographics and skyrocketing costs—make medical office space a logical play, but this niche sector with limited opportunities investing
in smaller buildings could easily be overwhelmed by capital.

A Dirty Issue: The Handling of Medical Waste

The creation and disposal of medical waste should be addressed in a lease for medical office space. Generally, medical waste regulatory acts define what medical waste is and establishes methods for handling and disposing of waste. Each medical entity that is subject to such the act is typically required to register with a state agency, such as the public health department, and have a documented medical waste management plan. These acts contain specific requirements for the packaging, containment, handling, disposal and incineration of medical waste. Regulatory requirements typically treat medical waste differently from that of hazardous wastes.  Accordingly, the types of hazardous wastes provisions in standard office leases usually include a supplement with a provision that specifically addresses medical wastes and the obligations of the landlord and tenant with respect to the disposal of the waste.

Commonly, the tenant that generates the medical waste is also liable for properly handling and disposing of the medical waste.  Careful drafting by an attorney is necessary to ensure that the lease properly delegates the responsibility for disposing of this waste.

Even when the landlord assumes the responsibility for removing the medical waste from the building, the tenant often is required to store the waste it has generated within the premises until the landlord’s medical waste disposal company picks up the waste for the building. These obligations must be carefully detailed. Tenants should consider requiring the landlord to hold the tenant harmless once the landlord takes possession of the waste, such as when the waste is placed in a common area designated by the landlord to receive medical waste.

A very critical aspect of identifying each party’s responsibilities is determining what is meant by “medical waste” or “infectious medical waste” as the obligations for handling each may be somewhat different. Generally, medical waste is a more inclusive than infectious waste.

A lease should require the tenant to immediately separate any medical or infectious medical wastes, upon production or generation, from other types of office waste and place such waste in a container that is marked “biohazard,” “infectious medical waste” or the like. The drafted lease can further specify that the container be leak-proof, moisture-proof, puncture-resistant, or has the strength to resist, tearing, ripping, or bursting in the course of normal usage or handling.

Landlords commonly prefer that the tenant contract directly with an appropriately licensed medical refuse company which operates in compliance with all federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the removal and destruction of medical waste. This limits the liability of the landlord should a tenant fail to remove medical wastes. Our office has seen landlords protect themselves by adding language regarding the failure of a tenant to remove medical waste whereby including a provision that gives the landlord the right to remove the medical waste and then bill the tenant for the costs of removing such waste.

If the landlord agrees to dispose of medical wastes generated by the tenant, then the lease may create liability for the landlord beyond just the care of the medical waste itself. Such liability is based on the landlord’s control over the premises. If the landlord allows medical waste to be stored outside of a tenant’s space, then the landlord assumes liability for the ultimate disposal of such waste. Thus, the landlord needs to give contractual control over the medical waste storage areas to the tenants and prohibit storage of medical waste in common areas or other areas under the landlord’s control.

Additional issues can arise upon termination of a lease if the tenant has not removed all of its medical wastes. Under a nuisance theory, a landlord may be liable for hidden dangers of which a new tenant has not been informed.

If landlord is responsible for disposal, it is imperative that the landlord provide such information to janitorial services in a building. The landlord needs to ensure that these workers are adequately trained to recognize the containers that are marked for medical waste and to avoid handling the containers marked for medical waste. Additionally, such workers should be informed to recognize medical waste that may have been inadvertently left open and how to place such medical waste in an appropriate container or more likely a scenario; notify the tenant to do so. Indemnification provisions should deal with this as well.

Conclusion

Given the danger of medical wastes to the lease space, property and community if improperly disposed by a tenant or landlord, our office recommends working with a knowledgeable medical real estate brokerage and attorney to assist with several strategies of dealing with consequences of medical waste on real estate transactions.

MREA Sets Sights on Houston’s Medical Real Estate Market

Houston, TX (WiredPRNews.com) — MREA | Medical Real Estate Advisors (www.MREAusa.com) has announced the launch of MREA – a healthcare real estate advisory focused on leasing, management, acquisition, disposition and development. MREA is a strategic initiative within the medical arena and will consist of a team of healthcare facility managers and commercial real estate professionals exclusively dedicated to representing customers and clients for their medical real estate needs.

MREA will offer clients strategic guidance, powerful research and detailed consulting in determining real estate opportunities within the most profitable and populous medical locations in the Greater Houston area. As healthcare real estate service providers, MREA will represent their clients by facilitating the special requirements of each particular medical assignment with creativity, sincerity and professionalism.

MREA will offer the following real estate services:

Site Selection
Acquisition
Leasing
Brokerage
Development
Financing
Asset Management
Property Management
Consulting

MREA is currently the only healthcare real estate boutique firm in the Houston area that offers a full-service model to its clients. Robert S. “Bob” Lowery, Managing Partner, assisted in formation of the firm and currently maintains over 5,000 physician, investor and hospital connections. Also, with Mr. Lowery’s leadership that spans two decades in the Houston community and years of experience assisting a broad range of investment capital seeking both commercial and healthcare real estate properties throughout Texas, MREA is a highly-connected, high-powered member of healthcare investment and owner-occupied real estate.

“After performing a thorough historical analysis of healthcare real estate leases and sales, we determined that the medical community, from physicians to investment, was not represented in a way that promotes the competitive spirit which is evident in other commercial real estate asset classes. Because the majority of the growth in the sector’s balance sheets and real estate occurred during the last decade, we think Greater Houston’s supply is ample to cover its demand. Thus, there is little concern for rental rate growth in the near term,” says Robert Lowery.

“A sure-fire way for owners to protect their healthcare real estate assets is through the services of a specialized firm that can facilitate the needs of both the medical sector and its real estate, not necessarily one of the other. Our grassroots efforts to obtain and secure relationships with physician groups and medical organizations along with our comprehension of the intricacies of the asset will allow MREA to grow rapidly as stability within the overall commercial real estate sector is found,” adds Mr. Lowery.

MREA is a full-service capable, medical focused real estate company that works with healthcare providers to augment existing business plans and strategies for growth, stability or consolidation of their real estate portfolio. The firm will provide comprehensive real estate solutions.

Reform Providing Opportunities in Healthcare Real Estate

Earlier this month, the Federal Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit struck down two challenges to the Affordable Care Act’s “individual mandate,” which requires individuals to purchase health insurance, or they will be forced to pay a monetary penalty.

Needless to say, the individual mandate requirement is by far the most controversial portion of the Affordable Care Act. Thus, it has been challenged in court on five separate occasions only one year after its adoption. Overall, and if I am keeping an accurate tally, three appellate judges have ruled that the minimum coverage requirement is unconstitutional and five have said the requirement is constitutional. It is unclear will occur throughout the appeals process, but it appears that the government and those who oppose the law will eventually argue their cases in front of the Supreme Court.

However, if you or your practice organization has remained on the sidelines, waiting for a government adopted solution, quietly remaining economically viable in the hopes that the Supreme Court will rule the law unconstitutional, you may have already missed the boat toward a modern and integrated future.

Whether it is “Meaningful Use” requirements, federal or state initiatives urging health care providers to modernize processes such as adopting EMRs or taking steps to avoid unnecessary medical procedures, there is no denying that the health care industry is well on its way to reform. While those in the industry that are not ready or resistant to these measures, they are undoubtedly holding out hope, waiting for a life raft while paying to great attention to the political theater around the Affordable Care Act. They are essentially neglecting to following the growing trends that are utilizing much more sophisticated technological and process advancements that are taking hold of the global economy.

Putting ACOs and “Meaningful Use” aside for a moment — the largest U.S. corporations will save billions in a integrated, efficient health care system that focuses on providing the best possible care for patients. Self-insured employers will save millions in medical bills with a system that can manage chronic diseases, reduce unnecessary procedures and emphasize preventative care.

Unfortunately, as reform of the system becomes a greater reality, corporations that purchase health insurance from outside vendors will continue to pass on a larger percentage of care to their employees; in this economy, employees are beginning to realize that the escalating costs for health benefits are reducing their hard-earned wages, which have remained stagnant for over a decade. See this article which suggests that, after inflation, wages are back to 1996 levels. Thus, we can’t continue to erode individual earnings to the working class without serious backlash — so reform is here to stay.

By adopting a modernization of processes, health care organizations will be able to provide efficient workflows throughout the system and higher quality of care for patients. As for those that remain on the sidelines, whereby suggesting that this movement will pass, I kindly request taking a moment from the busy profession to speak with leaders in your respective fields to see what tomorrow looks like — today.

From a healthcare real estate perspective, locating opportunities is becoming much easier as physicians have and continue to seek a flight to perceived safety (all at once), leaving areas that require the greatest need for their service and saturating others.

Medicare and Medicaid (With Some Alarming Statistics)

Medicare:

  • One of the top 10 Medicare billings, by dollar amount, is for the transport of a patient deemed not to be in a non-emergency situation.
  • One of the top 5 Medicare billings, by dollar amount, is for cataract surgery.
  • The #1 Medicare bill, by dollar amount, is for office visits by patients with medical problems that are considered low to moderate in severity.

Medicare is a federally funded and administered program that provides health insurance for older Americans and those who are disabled. Individuals contribute to Medicare during their working years, just as they do to Social Security. Since Medicare is a federal program, eligibility guidelines and services are much the same all over the country.

People eligible for the program include:

  • most persons over the age of 65,
  • persons with disability status, or
  • persons with irreversible kidney failure.

There are a number of Medicare plan choices. Two of the most widely available plans are Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage.

Medicaid:

Harris County is by far the worst abuser of the Medicaid system in Texas.  And, it does not appear like this will stop soon unless drastic changes take effect.  As of December 2010, more than 80% of those on Medicaid were under the age of 19.  Worse yet, of those children under the age of 19, approximately 50% were 5 years old or less.  So, essentially, of every $1.00 that is allocated toward Medicaid reimbursements, $.40 is for a child not yet enrolled in school.

Medicaid is a health insurance program financed and run jointly by the federal and state governments for low-income people of all ages who do not have the money or insurance to pay for health care. The goal of the program is to provide medical and other health care services to eligible individuals so that they are able to remain as self-sufficient as possible. Medicaid is a state administered program. Each state sets its own guidelines, subject to federal rules and guidelines. Certain services must be covered by the states in order to receive federal funds. Other services are optional and are elected by states.

Services that are often provided are:

  • health screening and services for children,
  • hospital and physician services,
  • laboratory services and X-rays,
  • care in nursing homes or
  • home health care services.

Medicaid eligibility in nearly every state is limited to:

  • low-income children,
  • pregnant women,
  • families with dependent children,
  • persons who are blind or disabled, and
  • persons 65 or older.

Other eligibility requirements must also be met.

Effect on Real Estate

As you hear from so many real estate practitioners, no one is entirely too sure.  It certainly appears both legislative bodies are colliding on the issue, which is where any uncertainty in the sector resides.

The Different Types of Ambulatory Surgery Centers

As commercial real estate professionals, with a strong, unique focus in the medical arena, we are involved in communication with several types of medical real estate owners and operators in the Greater Houston area on a routine basis.  Through our network of partners, vendors, physicians and hospital systems, we have had the privilege of a thorough comprehension of how the Ambulatory Surgery Center functions, thus creating significant value upon acquisition, disposition, and JV opportunities. We would like to dedicate this post to those that would like to increase their basic understanding of the Ambulatory Surgery Center (ASC).

First, the the ASC Safe Harbor regulations identify four different types of Ambulatory Surgery Center entities that may meet safe harbor protection.  These four types of ASC’s include Surgeon-Owned ASC’s, Single-Specialty ASC’s, Multi-Specialty ASC’s and Hospital-Physician ASC’s.  Each category has separate requirements that must be met in addition to the threshold requirements that are applicable to all ASC’s to meet the safe harbor.

Surgeon-Owned ASC’s

Owners of a surgeon-owned ASC may only include general surgeons or surgeons in the same surgical specialty.  The surgeons must be in a position to make referrals to the ASC and to perform surgical procedures on the patients that they refer.  Each surgeon owner must meet a variety of criteria, one of which is an income test for the previous fiscal year or 12-month period.  Each surgeon must derive at least one-third of their total medical practice income from performing surgical procedures that require an ASC or Hospital surgical setting, not location.  This structure does not require all procedures to be performed in the ASC in which they are an investor.  However, when a surgeon’s annual revenues are calculated, at least one-third of the physicians medical practice revenues, must come from the surgeon’s performance of procedures that are listed, as Medicare covered services in an ASC.  The surgical services may be performed in an ASC or in a hospital outpatient department and are not limited to the procedures actually performed in the surgeon-owned ASC.

Single-Specialty ASC’s

This safe harbor allows physicians within the same specialty, whether or not they are surgeons, to invest in an ASC to which they refer their patients and perform surgical procedures on patients in the ASC.  Group practices composed of a single-specialty may also own as well as refer to their own ASC.

Multi-Specialty ASC’s

This safe harbor permits physicians, who are in a variety of specialties, to form an ASC and make referrals to the ASC.  Physician investors in multi-specialty ASC must meet the one-third practice revenue test described above in relation to surgeon-owned ASC’s.  However, unlike surgeon-owned ASC’s, physicians in multi-specialty ASCs must actually perform one-third of their ASC procedures in the ASC in which they hold an financial interest.  This is commonly referred to as the “one-third/one-third” test.  The reasoning behind this requirement is that in this category of ASC, the physicians are actually using the ASC as an extension of their medical office and this does not create significant incentives to generate referral revenues for other investors.  Group practices, composed exclusively of physicians who meet the one-third/one-third test, may also invest in multi-specialty ASC’s.

Hospital/Physician ASCs

Under this safe harbor, a hospital, or several hospitals, must be an investor in the Ambulatory Surgery Center.  The remainder of the investors must be physicians, or group practices, who meet the requirements for a surgeon-owned ASC. There are a number of additional requirements that must be met by physician/hospital ASCs.

If you are an investor or owner, operator or interested party, please provide a call to Robert S. “Bob” Lowery for assistance for Greater Houston Ambulatory Surgery Centers.

Leasing Vs. Owning

Given my history, whereby I have reaped greater financial reward by representing buyers and sellers,  in my honest opinion, leasing is typically a better option for most business owners – rather than owning. Sometimes, local situations may justify owning commercial real estate. We all know stories about the business owner/operator whose real estate was in the path of growth and was bought out by a developer for substantial profit. We also know the purchaser who ran into a very timely deal when competition in the marketplace was thin.  The romance of owning real estate can be compelling and hindsight is 20-20. But, in other circumstances, real estate proves cumbersome and has inhibited the growth of many core business models. A lesson can be learned from large corporations who rarely choose to own their buildings. Often they sell, or sell and leaseback their real estate to get it off their books. Here are a few reasons why leasing is typically better than owning:

  1. Leasing affords more flexibility to expand or contract. It’s a less complicated to renegotiate lease terms than have to dispose of a building in a soft market.
  2. Buying and selling commercial real estate is a matter of market timing that professionals are better than any novices. As we have witnessed, those new to the game often buy at the top of the market or sell at the bottom.
  3. Business owners often make commercial real estate buying or selling decisions based upon the needs of their business rather than the real estate market. One of the two will suffer.
  4. The business may be neglected because of real estate management distractions. Real estate management is best performed by professionals.
  5. Selling a business may be more difficult if the buyer is required to buy the real estate as part of the transaction. The seller is negotiating on two fronts and one will have a diminished outcome.
  6. Precious working capital is tied up in financing the real estate.
  7. You can only write off interest expense (not amortization) on a mortgage while lease payments are 100% deductible.
  8. You can end up with phantom, taxable income when selling a depreciated building.
  9. You should be spending your time shaping your business and not dealing with the day-to-day maintenance and management headaches of owning a building. Let the landlord do it.
  10. Income-to-asset based ratios are improved by not owning real estate, which may help public companies compare better to others in the same industry.

As a reminder, whether leasing, buying or performing a sale-leaseback, our team services office and medical real estate owners and users in the Greater Houston area.  At your convenience, please provide a simple phone call to our office to determine how we may improve your position in the local marketplace.

The ideas and opinions discussed in this article are subject to change, especially given the proposed FASB/IASB rules.

Refinancing Medical Real Estate Through the SBA

You may or may not be privy to the changes that were made to U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) loan programs with the passage of the Small Business Jobs and Credit Act late last year. One of the most significant changes is the two-year provision that allows small business owners to use SBA 504 loans to refinance commercial real estate and other eligible fixed assets, and has provides tremendous support to physicians who own their commercial property.

By refinancing your commercial mortgage with a 504 loan, you may be able to tap the embedded equity in your commercial property, as well as take advantage of historically low interest rates. The SBA 504 loan program may be a well kept secret in commercial property financing, but because it offers the highest cash-on-cash return financing available, as well as below-market, long-term fixed interest rates and longer amortizations, it is essential to for any physician to understand.

As most have become familiar with the new medical landscape that grips most corners in the city of Houston, tremendous growth is also occurring in physician ownership.  Simply, the strategy allowed doctors to turn a monthly lease payment into a mortgage payment which builds equity, and creates wealth.  From the physician’s perspective, these decisions made practical business sense at the time, and most likely, because of the availability of capital, most physicians found it easy to obtaina loan from a commercial bank to finance the project.

Present Day: Similar to so many doctors that we speak to, most are facing a ballooning note payment. If the ability to refinance and take advantage of lower interest rates was available through your bank, the situation would become much more manageable. The difficulty is that it’s tough to find a bank that will do a conventional refinance these days, even for physicians. Today’s tighter underwriting standards have made it increasingly more difficult for borrowers to qualify.

The scenario, to which I have just described may not exactly describe your situation, but if you’ve purchased commercial property in the past 10 years, it is likely that I am not far off. The good news is that the Small Business Administration is providing a second chance by allowing refinancing with 504 loans of up to 90 percent loan-to-value and up to 125-percent with additional collateral pledged. This is a major benefit for medical practices, whether you’re struggling with a tough economy, declining reimbursements or insurance providers.

Eligibility

In January, the SBA announced specific guidelines to determine who qualifies for 504 refinancing. To find out if you’re eligible, answer the following five questions:

1) Does your note to be refinanced have a maturity date on or before 12/31/2012?

2) Has your debt been outstanding for at least two years?

3) Has your practice been in operation for at least two years?

4) Have you been current (no payment deferrals or past dues of more than 30 days) on your note for the past 12 months?

5) Was the debt to be refinanced substantially (85% or more) used for eligible 504 purposes originally (owner-occupied commercial real estate, heavy machinery, equipment, and closing costs related to the project)?

If you can answer “Yes” to all of the above questions, then SBA 504 refinancing is a necessary step for you and you should consider speaking with a SBA specialized lender immediately.

In addition to its beneficial terms for physicans, the SBA 504 program is a zero-subsidy program. In other words, it does not cost taxpayers anything. Program fees have carried it for years without any federal subsidy, and the program has run such a surplus at times that the government redirected some of these funds for entitlement spending a few years ago. In addition, the loan-loss rate is historically about one-third that of the 7(a) program, the SBA’s other flagship loan program, which has allowed refinancing for some time.

From the taxpayer’s perspective, 504 refinancing is a better deal, and you benefit as well. The 7(a) is mostly a floating-rate loan program, which isn’t the best option for long-term, hard assets like commercial property and often requires additional collateral. This additional collateral often takes the form of a second lien on your home or liens against inventory and receivables. This ties up those assets and can ultimately be problematic if you later need a line of credit or other short-term financing. By making 504 refinancing possible, the SBA is doing a world of good for many small medical practices.

Some critics will argue that this provision will only cause business-owners to use their commercial real estate like an ATM, much like homeowners did in the recent credit boom. But that analogy doesn’t apply here. Small businesses historically create the lion’s share of jobs in the U.S. Many small-business owners have cut expenses and have leveraged up to stay in business during an economically difficult period. In addition, entrepreneurial physicians like you typically make decisions to maximize profits and grow your business — not to spend recklessly.

Also…There is one other thing you should know, something that’s an indirect benefit to you. This refinance provision also helps banks. It’s no secret that banks are being forced by their regulators to increase their capital, lower their risks and generally strengthen their balance sheets. In many cases, that means reducing their exposure to commercial real estate. If you approach your bank to refinance your commercial mortgage into a 504 loan, you might just be doing your banker a huge favor. And working with a lender who specializes in 504 lending without requiring any change in your banking relationship will lessen any perceived threat in this situation.

If you’ve purchased commercial property for your practice from 2004-2008, you should consider refinancing with an SBA 504 loan.  Even if you have not purchased property, you are most likely aware of someone that has.  Please, do them a favor and forward this article along as this opportunity may not be around for a while, especially at today’s interest rates and limited equity necessary to qualify.