In light of recent articles regarding the largest commercial real estate brokerage firm in the world NOT providing data to the largest online commercial real estate data provider, we thought we would make our viewers aware of the positive and negative of seeking commercial real estate information online.
Having spent considerable time with a few of the largest commercial real estate platforms in the country, I can attest that commercial real estate dealings are kept sacred, some having bound agreements as to non-disclosure among all parties involved, and rightfully so. These are business engagements that involve competitive people, seeking a competitive advantage in their respective competitive markets. Mirroring the administrative behaviors of everyday business affairs within other industries, commercial real estate is, and should be treated, no different.
Which brings me back to the first line of this article to which I may provide an analogous, hypothetical point. In general, should businesses voluntarily engage in providing market data to third parties so that they can republish, or repurpose the data to fit their own needs? Further, should we provide privileged information from a competitive business landscape to online platforms that are controlled by competitive businesspersons that sell this data to our competitors, and worse yet, may sell this to a purchasing entity to be taken private or sent overseas? Well, it appears that the largest commercial real estate firm in the world thinks not.
So, given the fact that not all commercial real estate listings, transactional activity or data is secured by online platforms, and, in all actuality, less than 50% is captured, it is certainly questionable as to why users seek such data or trends to influence their financial decisions. Given the certainty now, that some, or most, commercial real estate transactional activity goes unreported, or underreported, to online platforms, why are individuals, owners, investors, businesses or hospital systems relying on this information for a perceived advantage in real estate negotiations. It just proves wasteful, ill-informed and, dare I say, lazy. Given the fact that state politicians and regulatory authorities largely determine how much information a business should share to the public, it is in our belief that the commercial real estate industry should rely on such data, as well as their own best efforts to influence decision-making in the sector. This promotes competition where, eventually, the creme rises to the top.
As for commercial real estate listing or transactional reporting right now, most will say that ‘it is the best we got”, to which I disagree. This suggests that anything is better than nothing and proves why it is imperative to seek qualified professionals that specialize, who become proficient within a certain sector, or area, of their market. The greater the specialization within a segment, the more efficient the data. The businesses that capture this data then hold the advantage to whom it should be shared, which will lead to a competitive advantage for themselves and their clients. See, the industry does not need underutilized, poorly informed, general salespeople seeking to sidle up to every potential transaction by distributing data that appears convincing in the hopes that an unjustified reward will find its way in their direction. Rather, we need, and deserve, active, intelligent leaders who comprehend that a high level of command, or mastery, within any endeavor, is the greatest path to long-term financial reward.
